Talk:La DEA of Libra:Quests/@comment-2026315-20140510021723/@comment-2026315-20140510035107

Also, to elaborate on the table split:

- I completely agree that it's useful to mention that some quests are inconsequential to the plot. But that can be summarized with a line like "if the quest type isn't Festival Preparation or Friendship, no effect on routes or events, can be skipped or completed for rewards" without having to split the tables.

- Originator is a relevant field for the bottom table too, since some originators are connected to 新クエスト追加 functions.

- Same with the rewards column. I was considering merging the "faction" column with "reward" later on too, just like the game does, since there's not much point in emphasizing the faction points when players should look at La_DEA_of_Libra:Walkthrough/Route to make sure they get on the route they want.

The game itself has one table for all the quests. Having all the quests in one table in chronological order seems like it would read naturally to people who consult this page as they work through the game. Filling out a lot of the details (like rewards and originator) had been low priority, because I think that people who come to the wiki because they have trouble with a quest are most interested in a) the Japanese name of the quest (to look it up), b) what to do to complete it (quest type+description+notes).